Walk On!
More kids are using foot power to get to school
By Charles Pekow
“I was just trying to get kids to ride their bikes and walk to school,
because I was disheartened by seeing so many children being driven,” recalls
Deirdra Rogers.
Rogers is a pioneer of sorts. In 2000 she organized one of the nation’s
first Safe Routes to School task forces at Manor School in Fairfax, Calif.,
outside San Francisco. Safe Routes is aimed at reducing traffic congestion
around schools and promoting the healthy alternatives of walking and biking
to school.
Rogers boasts that in three years, the percentage of children walking
or biking to school has increased from 24 percent to 42 percent at the
300-pupil elementary school.
She found that as much as 21 percent of congested California rush hour
traffic stems from parents driving their sons and daughters to class.
So why were parents, most of whom walked to school in their own elementary
school days, reluctant to encourage their kids to? The task force sent
a questionnaire to parents, with a school newsletter. The answers revealed
a catch-22: Parents didn’t want their children to walk because they deemed
the routes too unsafe—because of the congestion they were causing by driving
kids to school. “Our school is not really on the way to most people’s
jobs, so it would cause traffic jams as they’d double back,” Rogers explains.
To get kids on their feet or bike pedals, the project started small:
Walk to School Wednesdays. The task force sought parents in each neighborhood
willing to walk or bike to school once a week with neighborhood kids.
“When it is really rainy or cold, they turn into car pools,” Rogers says
of the walking and biking pools.
The group identified some traffic problems and convinced the town council
to apply, successfully, to the California Department of Transportation
for a grant to fix them. The project includes placing a pedestrian bridge
over a creek where children had to share an unstriped road with autos.
“We had focus groups to lessen controversy. We had two open houses (inviting
the public to review and comment on plans), so we knew it was representative
of what the town wanted,” Rogers explains.
Safe Routes Strategy
Despite cuts in physical education programs and a 63 percent rise in
childhood obesity over the past generation, fewer than 10 percent of trips
to school are made by walking, according to the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention. And exercise and fresh air in the morning can make students
more alert, while cutting traffic congestion and exhaust children breathe.
More than laziness and distance explain the reluctance of many parents
to let their children get to school on their own energy. About 176 American
children are killed while walking or biking to and from school every year.
Another 15,600 suffer injuries. And these figures understate the casualties,
according to the National Research Council, which compiled them, because
they only include collisions with autos.
So groups around the country, with backing from the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration, developed the adaptable Safe Routes program.
The 2002 Summary of Safe Routes to Schools Programs in the United States
identified four strategies:
- Engineering: Changing the environment, such as building a bike path
or relocating a drop-off point
- Enforcement: Issuing speeding tickets
- Encouragement/Education: Promoting cycling and walking, and teaching
safety
- Dedicated Resources: Setting aside money and finding grants available
from many state education and transportation offices.
Learning to Walk
A main component of the Safe Routes strategy is teaching children and
parents why they should walk or bike to school. It helps to blend Safe
Routes into existing curricula, notes Heather Thomas, parent coordinator
for Dallin Elementary School in Arlington, Mass. “Teachers are overburdened
by all these great ideas coming at them but they don’t have the time or
energy to deal with them,” Thomas says. The school used parent volunteers
to help integrate street safety into physical education, for instance.
To encourage youth to walk even in harsh weather, winter classes and
art and essay contests focused on polar bears. “We talk about the ice
cap melting, the effect of cars on the environment, global warming, and
how walking could stop global warming and help polar bears,” says Project
Coordinator Dorothea Haas of WalkBoston.
Boston-area Safe Routes schools gave children pedometers and built math
problems around them to encourage walking for health and environmental
benefits. Principals and janitors got pedometers and students entered
contests to guess how many steps they took in a week.
Many Safe Routes schools sponsor raffles, with many variants on the
game. Typically, students get a ticket or mark on a scorecard for every
day they walk to school within a given time frame. In Dallin’s Step Into
Spring campaign, “Kids keep a chart of how many times they walk to school.
The more you walk, the more entries you put in the drawing and the more
chances you get of winning,” Thomas explains. Parents (and sometimes middle-school
children, who can make better solicitors) ask local businesses to donate
small prizes ranging from gift certificates to toys, snacks, vouchers
for ice cream and video rentals, and the like, Thomas says.
Other schools use other prize models. At Mill Valley Middle School in
Mill Valley, Calif., for instance, students get a prize for every 20 Walk
and Roll days they walk or roll to class. They may be less interested
in toys than younger students, but a coupon for a smoothie rewards many
adequately, says local Safe Routes coordinator Cynthia Witwicki.
Three years ago, Witwicki moved from Toronto to Mill Valley. Yet despite
the move to a much warmer climate free of blizzards, she found many more
children getting rides to school than in the North. “My daughter was in
grade three. She would get asked weird questions from her peers: ‘Why
do you walk or bike to school? Why don’t you have two cars?’” In this
well-to-do community, “everyone likes to drive their cars,” Witwicki notes.
So she responded to a notice in the school newsletter looking for a Safe
Routes team leader. “We ran a contest for a better name and came up with
Local Motion. A third-grader came up with the name. We gave the child
some bike gloves or something like that,” she recalls.
Local Motion had to deal with an environmental problem making it hazardous
to walk to school. Local police and traffic engineers recommended placing
adult crossing guards at several intersections. “It’s very difficult to
find crossing guards. Turnover is horrendous,” Witwicki says. While the
school system hired a private group to recruit and train guards in the
long run, “we asked each class to take a turn one or two weeks a year
to provide two parents to carry a stop sign and be out there with (child)
crossing guards. Initially we had problems in some classes” that lacked
parents who stayed home or worked near enough to school, she says. “We
started this right after 9-11, when people were more concerned about supervision
and who comes on school grounds.”
Finding Funding
Parent groups can operate Safe Routes programs on relatively low budgets
with support from the school and a handful of dedicated volunteers. But
you also might find some outside help. The National Center for Bicycling
& Walking reported last spring that 11 states fund Safe Routes programs
to varying degrees, and three others were in the process of implementing
Safe Routes authorization. California, for instance, sets aside a portion
of federal transportation money for local Safe Routes grants annually.
Other states funnel their own or federal money from transportation, education,
health, or environmental accounts. Legislation pending in Congress would
provide funding to all states.
But PTOs that lack comprehensive funding can still sit down and decide
what to focus on: a lack of sidewalks, a monthly walk to school day, or
safety curriculum, for instance. With school budgets what they are in
this economy, it helps to suggest inexpensive infrastructure improvements.
The effort at Montebello Elementary in Baltimore found a simple change
improved safety: moving the drop-off point for children driven to school
away from the front entrance. All the school had to do was put up signs
and striping to direct autos to an underused parking lot at the back of
the school. Down went congestion and illegal double parking at the front
of the school, where students on foot and bike previously had to dodge
traffic and suck in exhaust fumes.
And parent groups can turn their fundraisers into Safe Routes projects.
A few Florida PTOs bought bike helmets in bulk and sold them, profiting
from the mark-up while increasing bike safety.
Home | About Us | Toolkit
| Marin County Programs | Forms
| Lesson Plans | Events/Contests
|
Health and Safety | Newsletters
| Press Room | Links/Resources
| Contact Us
|